Papers
arxiv:2607.29602

FriendBench: Benchmarking Dyadic Familiarity Inference in Humans and Multimodal Large Language Models

Published on Sep 14
Authors:
,
,
,
,

Abstract

FriendBench evaluates whether models and humans can distinguish familiar from stranger dyads in brief ice-breaker clips, revealing comparable accuracy but differing biases and modality use.

Reading a social situation often depends on behavior, not words alone. We introduce FriendBench, a benchmark for inferring whether two people are already familiar or are meeting as strangers, from a 20-second clip of a dyadic ice-breaker conversation. Every pair answers the same type of prompt, so only the manner of interaction can reveal the answer. Across text, audio, and video, we compare 26 models from seven companies against matched human panels over 96 balanced dyads. The best model and the human crowd are statistically indistinguishable on accuracy in every modality, but reach it differently: humans stay balanced across the two answers, while the strongest models favor ``stranger.'' This is a difference in effective prior, not in discrimination. Richer channels help both unequally, and only humans gain from visible behavior on top of speech. We release the stimuli, human ratings, and model predictions.

Community

Sign up or log in to comment

Get this paper in your agent:

hf papers read 2607.29602
Don't have the latest CLI?
curl -LsSf https://hf.co/cli/install.sh | bash

Models citing this paper 0

No model linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2607.29602 in a model README.md to link it from this page.

Datasets citing this paper 0

No dataset linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2607.29602 in a dataset README.md to link it from this page.

Spaces citing this paper 0

No Space linking this paper

Cite arxiv.org/abs/2607.29602 in a Space README.md to link it from this page.

Collections including this paper 0

No Collection including this paper

Add this paper to a collection to link it from this page.